LESSON 8.1 — Structural Principles and Load Types
A. Standard Map
| Topic | Governing Source | Exam Focus |
|---|---|---|
| Dead / live loads | IS 875 Parts 1–2 | Unit weights; occupancy LL by use |
| Wind / snow | IS 875 Parts 3–4 | Windward pressure; roof suction < 30° slope |
| Seismic | IS 1893:2016 | Not IS 875; equivalent static base shear |
| Load combinations | IS 456 Annex B | 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL; wind/seismic not combined |
| Slenderness | IS 456 Cl. 25.1.2 | λ = Le/r; short if λ ≤ 12 |
| Load path | — | Slab → beam → column → footing → soil |
B. Mechanism in Words
- Classify each load by source, nature (static/dynamic), and governing code.
- Select the critical load combination for the design situation (gravity, uplift, lateral).
- Map the load path through members — stiffness attracts load; infill is not structural.
- Identify the dominant structural action (compression, bending, shear) at each member.
- Check slenderness and stability where compression or lateral drift governs.
C. Core Concept Explanations
C1. Load Classification
Load Classification by Source
| Load Type | Nature | Origin | Indian Code | Critical for |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dead Load (DL) | Static | Self-weight of structure + permanent non-structural elements (walls, finishes, fixed equipment) | IS 875 Part 1 | All design situations |
| Live / Imposed Load (LL) | Static / quasi-static | Occupancy: people, furniture, stored goods; variable in magnitude and position | IS 875 Part 2 | Floors, beams, columns |
| Wind Load (WL) | Dynamic (treated statically) | Air pressure and suction on building surfaces | IS 875 Part 3 | Tall/slender/lightweight structures |
| Snow Load (SL) | Static | Accumulated snow on roofs; geography-dependent | IS 875 Part 4 | Hill-station buildings (Shimla, Gulmarg, Gangtok) |
| Seismic Load (EL) | Dynamic | Ground acceleration → inertial forces in the building mass | IS 1893:2016 | All buildings; zones II–V |
| Impact Load | Dynamic | Sudden application → dynamic amplification of LL | IS 875 Part 2 (Annex) | Elevator machinery, cranes, vehicle impact |
| Earth Pressure | Static | Lateral soil pressure on basement walls and retaining structures | IS 1893 / IS 3370 | Basement/substructure |
| Hydrostatic Pressure | Static | Upward force from high water table on foundation slabs | IS 3370 | Foundation slab |
| Settlement Load | Static | Differential settlement → induced stresses | — | Foundation design |
Static vs Dynamic — Structural Distinction
| Criterion | Static Load | Dynamic Load |
|---|---|---|
| Application rate | Gradual; inertia negligible | Rapid; inertia forces significant |
| Structural response | Quasi-static equilibrium | Time-dependent; resonance risk |
| Design approach | Equivalent static force | Response spectrum / time-history (IS 1893) |
| Examples | DL, LL, SL, earth pressure | Seismic, impact, blast, wind gust (flutter) |
Note: IS 1893 converts seismic forces into an equivalent static base shear for design purposes. The dynamic nature is captured through the response spectrum (Sa/g), not by direct dynamic analysis at this level.
C2. IS 875 — Parts 1–5 Scope
IS 875 Reference Table
| Part | Title | Load Governed | Key Output |
|---|---|---|---|
| Part 1 (1987) | Dead Loads — Unit Weights of Building Materials and Stored Materials | Permanent gravity loads | Unit weights (kN/m³) for concrete, masonry, soil, finishes, stored goods |
| Part 2 (1987) | Imposed Loads | Occupancy / live loads | Floor LL by occupancy type (residential 2.0 kN/m², office 4.0 kN/m²); roof LL; impact factors |
| Part 3 (2015) | Wind Loads | Wind pressure and suction | Design wind speed Vz; wind pressure pz = 0.6Vz²; pressure/suction coefficients (Cp); critical for tall/lightweight structures |
| Part 4 (1987) | Snow Loads | Snow accumulation on roofs | Ground snow load → roof snow load; shape coefficients by roof geometry |
| Part 5 (1987) | Special Loads and Load Combinations | Combined load effects | Guidelines for load combinations; special loads (thermal, vibration, erection) |
Exam anchor: IS 875 does NOT cover seismic loads. Seismic design is governed exclusively by IS 1893:2016. IS 875 Part 5 provides general load combination guidance, but the primary combination factors for limit state design (LSM) are in IS 456:2000 (Annex B) and IS 800:2007.
C3. Load Combinations
Load Combination Logic
Load combinations ensure that the worst simultaneous loading is considered. The governing combination depends on the design situation.
| Combination | Expression (LSM — IS 456) | Governs For |
|---|---|---|
| DL + LL | 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL | Standard gravity design (beams, slabs, columns in low-rise) |
| DL + WL | 0.9 DL + 1.5 WL | Uplift / overturning check (roof, foundation with net upward wind) |
| DL + LL + WL | 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WL | Tall buildings; lateral + gravity combined |
| DL + LL + EL | 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL ± 1.2 EL | Seismic zone design (IS 1893) |
| DL + EL | 0.9 DL ± 1.5 EL | Overturning under seismic; minimum gravity stabilises |
| DL only | 1.5 DL | Dead load alone (erection stage; pre-cast before LL applied) |
Key principle: Wind and seismic are NOT combined — design for the more critical of the two (IS 1893 Cl. 6.3.1.2).
Partial safety factors above apply to LSM (IS 456). Working Stress Method (WSM) uses unfactored loads with permissible stresses — awareness only.
Which Combination Governs Which Situation
| Design Situation | Critical Combination | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Simply supported beam in a residential building | 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL | Wind/seismic irrelevant for gravity spans |
| Column in a 25-storey building | 1.2 (DL + LL + WL) | Wind moment governs column design at upper floors |
| Foundation uplift check | 0.9 DL + 1.5 WL | Minimum gravity vs maximum uplift — 0.9 factor reduces stabilising effect |
| Shear wall at base | 0.9 DL ± 1.5 EL | Seismic overturning governs foundation and shear wall design |
| Flat roof — lightweight structure | 0.9 DL + 1.5 WL | Net upward wind suction may exceed dead weight |
C4. Structural Actions — Member Behaviour
Structural Actions Table
| Action | Definition | Stress Type Induced | Typical Member | Visual Sign |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Compression | Member shortens under axial load along its axis | Compressive stress (σ = P/A) | Column, arch rib, top chord of truss | Shortening / lateral buckling if slender |
| Tension | Member elongates under axial pull | Tensile stress (σ = P/A) | Tie, bottom chord of truss, hanger | Elongation; no buckling risk |
| Bending | Transverse load creates curvature; top fibres in compression, bottom in tension (sagging) | Bending stress (σ = M·y/I); varies linearly across section | Beam, slab, rafter | Deflection; cracking at tension face in RC |
| Shear | Forces parallel to cross-section; tendency for one part to slide past another | Shear stress (τ = VQ/Ib); max at neutral axis | Beam web, column base, connection | Diagonal tension cracks (45°) in RC beams |
| Torsion | Twisting about the longitudinal axis; force offset from shear centre | Shear stresses around the section periphery | Spandrel beam, eccentrically loaded beam | Warping; helical cracking |
| Combined Bending + Axial | Column carries axial load + moment (eccentric loading) | Bending + direct stress; one face has higher compression | Eccentrically loaded column, beam-column | Unsymmetric stress distribution |
Member Type vs Dominant Action
| Member | Primary Action | Secondary Action |
|---|---|---|
| Column | Compression | Bending (if eccentric or lateral load) |
| Beam | Bending | Shear |
| Tie / bracing diagonal | Tension | — |
| Arch rib | Compression | Bending (if non-funicular load) |
| Slab | Bending (two-way or one-way) | Shear (punching at columns) |
| Spandrel beam | Torsion + Bending | Shear |
| Footing | Bending (cantilever from column) | Punching shear |
C5. Slenderness and Buckling
Slenderness Ratio
Slenderness ratio λ quantifies a compression member’s susceptibility to buckling (lateral instability under axial load):
λ = Le / r
Where:
– Le = effective length of the column (depends on end conditions; see table below)
– r = least radius of gyration of the cross-section = √(I/A); use the minimum I about any axis
| End Condition | Effective Length Le | Multiplier on actual length L |
|---|---|---|
| Both ends pinned (free to rotate, held in position) | L | 1.0 L |
| One end fixed, other end pinned | 0.7 L | 0.7 L |
| Both ends fixed (no rotation, no translation) | 0.5 L | 0.5 L |
| One end fixed, other end free (cantilever) | 2.0 L | 2.0 L |
IS 456 Cl. 25.1.2: A column is classified as short if λ ≤ 12 in both axes; slender (long) if λ > 12. Slender columns require additional moment due to P-Δ effects.
Euler Buckling — Awareness Level
Euler’s formula gives the critical load at which a theoretically perfect slender column buckles:
Pcr = π² E I / Le²
- Pcr is the theoretical elastic buckling load (N)
- E = modulus of elasticity of material (N/mm²)
- I = second moment of area (mm⁴) about the axis of buckling
- Le = effective length (mm)
Exam-level awareness:
– Buckling load decreases as Le² — doubling the effective length reduces Pcr by 75%.
– Buckling always occurs about the axis of least I (or least r).
– Real columns buckle below Pcr due to initial imperfections, eccentricity, and material nonlinearity.
– Euler applies only to slender, elastic columns — not to short RC columns.
C6. Load Path
Gravity Load Path — Frame Building
The load path is the route by which applied loads travel from the point of application to the ground. Loads follow the path of least resistance (highest stiffness).
Roof/Floor Live + Dead Load
↓
Slab (bending — transfers load to supporting beams/walls)
↓
Beam (bending + shear — collects slab loads; spans to columns)
↓
Column (compression ± bending — stacks loads floor-by-floor)
↓
Footing / Foundation (spreads concentrated column load over soil)
↓
Soil (bearing pressure; must not exceed safe bearing capacity)
Principles Governing Load Path
| Principle | Implication |
|---|---|
| Stiffness attracts load | A stiffer element carries more load; shear walls attract more lateral force than adjacent columns |
| Continuity of path | Any break in the load path (missing column, inadequate connection) creates a local overstress |
| Short path is efficient | Loads travel the shortest continuous stiff path; longer paths increase member forces |
| Infill ≠ load-bearing | Brick infill in RC frames is NOT part of the structural load path unless designed as such; it creates stiffness irregularity, not load carrying capacity |
| Tributary area determines beam load | Each beam carries load from the slab area tributary to it; interior beams carry twice the area of edge beams |
Load Path in Wall-Dominant (Masonry) System
Roof/Floor Load
↓
Roof Slab / Beams
↓
Load-Bearing Wall (direct compression path)
↓
Strip / Spread Footing
↓
Soil
Key distinction from frame: In wall-dominant systems, every opening (door, window) interrupts the load path and requires a lintel to redistribute load around the opening.
C7. Lateral Stability
Why Lateral Stability Requires Dedicated Systems
Gravity frames (beams + columns with simple/pin connections) resist vertical loads efficiently but provide little resistance to horizontal forces (wind, seismic). Without a lateral system:
– Columns act as vertical cantilevers — highly inefficient in bending
– The frame undergoes large sway (inter-storey drift)
– P-Δ effects amplify moments and risk collapse
Lateral Stability Systems
| System | Mechanism | Height Range | Key Feature |
|---|---|---|---|
| Shear Wall | In-plane stiffness of RC wall resists lateral force as a vertical cantilever; also carries gravity | Up to ~35 storeys | Most common in Indian mid-rise; placed at cores/lift shafts |
| Braced Frame | Diagonal bracing members create triangulated zones; lateral force carried in axial action (not bending) | 30–50 storeys | More efficient than moment frame; braces restrict openings |
| Moment-Resisting Frame | Rigid beam-column connections resist rotation; frame sways but develops moments at joints | Up to ~20–25 storeys | Flexible floor plans; bending-dominated = less efficient |
| Core + Outrigger | Stiff RC core plus deep outrigger beams engaging perimeter columns | 40–60 storeys | Outriggers dramatically increase effective depth of lateral system |
Why Bracing and Shear Walls Matter
- Without lateral stiffness, a tall building behaves as an unbraced cantilever of enormous height → drift governs, not strength.
- Drift limit (IS 1893): Inter-storey drift under design seismic force ≤ 0.004 × storey height.
- Shear walls provide stiffness far exceeding that of equivalent column area → preferred for seismic zones.
- Shear walls at the perimeter (symmetrically placed) minimise torsional response under seismic loading.
D. Worked Numericals and Parameter Tables
Load Combination Reference Table + Worked Numericals
Load Combination Quick-Reference
| # | Combination | LSM Factors | Common Use Case |
|---|---|---|---|
| LC1 | DL + LL | 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL | Beam / slab gravity design |
| LC2 | DL + WL | 0.9 DL + 1.5 WL | Uplift / overturning |
| LC3 | DL + LL + WL | 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WL | Tall building — lateral + gravity |
| LC4 | DL + LL + EL | 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL ± 1.2 EL | Seismic zone design |
| LC5 | DL + EL | 0.9 DL ± 1.5 EL | Seismic overturning / foundation uplift |
Numerical (a): Simply Supported Beam — UDL
Problem:
A simply supported RC beam spans 6 m. It carries a superimposed dead load (SDL, finishes + partitions) of 4 kN/m and a live load of 8 kN/m. The beam self-weight is 6 kN/m. Determine:
(i) Total factored UDL (using LC1)
(ii) Maximum factored bending moment
(iii) Maximum factored shear force
(iv) Serviceability check — is the span/effective depth ratio adequate if effective depth d = 500 mm?
Solution:
Step 1 — Unfactored loads:
– DL = Self weight + SDL = 6 + 4 = 10 kN/m
– LL = 8 kN/m
Step 2 — Factored UDL (LC1: 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL):
– wu = 1.5 × 10 + 1.5 × 8 = 15 + 12 = 27 kN/m
Step 3 — Maximum factored bending moment:
$$M_{max} = frac{w_u L^2}{8} = frac{27 times 6^2}{8} = frac{27 times 36}{8} = frac{972}{8} = textbf{121.5 kN·m}$$
Location: at midspan
Step 4 — Maximum factored shear force:
$$V_{max} = frac{w_u L}{2} = frac{27 times 6}{2} = textbf{81 kN}$$
Location: at supports
Step 5 — Serviceability check (IS 456:2000, Cl. 23.2.1):
– Basic span/effective depth ratio for simply supported beam = 20 (for spans ≤ 10 m)
– Required d ≥ L/20 = 6000/20 = 300 mm
– Provided d = 500 mm > 300 mm ✓
– Span/depth check is satisfied. (Note: IS 456 applies modification factors for steel stress and tension reinforcement percentage; base value 20 is the starting benchmark.)
Summary:
| Quantity | Value |
|—|—|
| Factored UDL wu | 27 kN/m |
| Mmax (factored) | 121.5 kN·m at midspan |
| Vmax (factored) | 81 kN at supports |
| Span/depth check | 500 mm > 300 mm ✓ |
Numerical (b): Column Slenderness Ratio
Problem:
An RC column has an unsupported height of 4.0 m. Both ends are fixed against rotation but free to translate (i.e., sway frame). The column section is 300 mm × 450 mm. Determine:
(i) Effective length Le
(ii) Least radius of gyration r
(iii) Slenderness ratio λ
(iv) Classify as short or slender
Solution:
Step 1 — Effective length:
For both ends fixed, no sway: Le = 0.65 L (IS 456 Table 28 / NBC Part 6)
For sway frame (fixed-fixed with sway): Le = 1.2 L
Using sway condition (more common in practice): Le = 1.2 × 4000 = 4800 mm
Assumption: sway frame. If both ends are truly fixed with no lateral translation, use Le = 0.5 L = 2000 mm. State assumption in exam.
Step 2 — Cross-section properties:
– b = 300 mm, D = 450 mm
– I_min = (300³ × 450)/12 — wait, use the smaller dimension for minimum I:
– I_min = (b³D)/12 — about the axis along D:
– I_min = (300)³ × 450 / 12 — No. Correct approach:
– About the minor axis (parallel to 450 mm face): I_minor = D × b³/12 = 450 × 300³/12 = 450 × 27,000,000/12 = 1,012,500,000 / 12 = 1.0125 × 10⁹ mm⁴
Actually, simplifying with standard formula:
– I_minor (about axis parallel to longer dimension) = (D · b³)/12 = (450 × 300³)/12
– = (450 × 27,000,000)/12 = 12,150,000,000/12 = 1,012.5 × 10⁶ mm⁴
- A = 300 × 450 = 135,000 mm²
Step 3 — Least radius of gyration (about minor axis):
$$r_{min} = sqrt{frac{I_{min}}{A}} = sqrt{frac{1,012.5 times 10^6}{135,000}} = sqrt{7,500} = textbf{86.6 mm}$$
Quick check: for a rectangle, r = b/√12 = 300/3.464 = 86.6 mm ✓
Step 4 — Slenderness ratio:
$$lambda = frac{L_e}{r_{min}} = frac{4800}{86.6} = textbf{55.4}$$
Step 5 — Classification (IS 456 Cl. 25.1.2):
– λ = 55.4 >> 12 → Slender (long) column
– Slender columns require design for additional moment due to P-Δ effects (IS 456 Cl. 39.7).
Summary:
| Parameter | Value |
|—|—|
| Unsupported height L | 4,000 mm |
| Effective length Le (sway) | 4,800 mm |
| Section | 300 × 450 mm |
| I_minor | 1,012.5 × 10⁶ mm⁴ |
| Area A | 135,000 mm² |
| r_min | 86.6 mm |
| Slenderness ratio λ | 55.4 |
| Classification | Slender column (λ > 12) |
E. Common Confusions
- Windward = suction, leeward = pressure — Reversed. Windward face = positive pressure (wind pushes in). Leeward face = negative pressure / suction (wind pulls awa…
- Roof slope < 30° has wind pressure on windward slope — Wrong. IS 875 Part 3: windward roof slopes less than 30° experience suction (negative pressure), not pressure. P…
- Point load formula Mmax = wL²/8 — wL²/8 applies to UDL only. For a point load P at midspan: Mmax = PL/4. For P at any point: Mmax = Pab/L. Mixing these is…
- Infill brick wall = load-bearing wall — Infill walls in RC frames are non-structural. They do NOT carry floor/roof loads. They add stiffness (can attract seismi…
- Snow load applies across India — IS 875 Part 4 snow loads are relevant only in hill-station regions (Himalayas, parts of NE India). Applying snow load to…
- Slenderness ratio = Height / Width — λ = Le/r, not L/b. The denominator is the radius of gyration r = √(I/A), not the width. Using width directly gives a…
F. Exam Traps
| Trap | Incorrect Belief | Correct Principle |
|---|---|---|
| Windward = suction, leeward = pressure | Common misconception about windward = suction, leeward = pressure | Reversed. Windward face = positive pressure (wind pushes in). Leeward face = negative pressure / suction (wind pulls away). Both sides contribute to net lateral force. |
| Roof slope < 30° has wind pressure on windward slope | Common misconception about roof slope < 30° has wind pressure on windward slope | Wrong. IS 875 Part 3: windward roof slopes less than 30° experience suction (negative pressure), not pressure. Pressure occurs only when slope > 30°. This governs uplift design of shallow-pitch roofs. |
| Point load formula Mmax = wL²/8 | Common misconception about point load formula mmax = wl²/8 | wL²/8 applies to UDL only. For a point load P at midspan: Mmax = PL/4. For P at any point: Mmax = Pab/L. Mixing these is the single most common numerical error. |
| Infill brick wall = load-bearing wall | Common misconception about infill brick wall = load-bearing wall | Infill walls in RC frames are non-structural. They do NOT carry floor/roof loads. They add stiffness (can attract seismic force unpredictably) but are not designed as structural members. Treating them as load-bearing overestimates capacity and misjudges failure mode. |
| Snow load applies across India | Common misconception about snow load applies across india | IS 875 Part 4 snow loads are relevant only in hill-station regions (Himalayas, parts of NE India). Applying snow load to buildings in Chennai, Mumbai, or Delhi is incorrect. |
| Slenderness ratio = Height / Width | Common misconception about slenderness ratio = height / width | λ = Le/r, not L/b. The denominator is the radius of gyration r = √(I/A), not the width. Using width directly gives an incorrect (usually lower) result. |
| Wind and seismic loads are combined in the governing combination | Common misconception about wind and seismic loads are combined in the governing combination | IS 1893 Cl. 6.3.1.2 explicitly states wind and seismic forces need NOT be combined. Design for the more critical of the two independently. |
| Higher stiffness means lower load | Common misconception about higher stiffness means lower load | Stiffer elements attract more load (load proportional to stiffness in a parallel system). A shear wall added to a frame takes a disproportionate share of lateral load precisely because it is stiffer. |
| Le for a cantilever column = L | Common misconception about le for a cantilever column = l | For a fixed-base, free-top cantilever: Le = 2L. This effectively doubles the slenderness ratio compared to a pinned-pinned column of the same height — critical for isolated ground-floor columns in stilt buildings. |
| IS 875 Part 5 covers seismic loads | Common misconception about is 875 part 5 covers seismic loads | IS 875 Part 5 covers special loads and load combinations (thermal, erection, etc.). Seismic loads are covered exclusively by IS 1893:2016. Selecting IS 875 for seismic is a standard MCQ trap. |
G. Answer-Writing Cues
NAT (beam moment):
“For a simply supported beam under factored UDL wu over span L, Mmax = wuL²/8 at midspan. For a point load P at midspan, Mmax = PL/4 — do not mix formulas.”
MCQ (IS 875):
“Design wind pressure on facades is governed by IS 875 Part 3 (2015). Part 1 = dead loads; Part 2 = imposed loads; seismic loads are under IS 1893 only.”
Slenderness NAT:
“λ = Le/r where r = √(I/A). For a square column b×b about minor axis, r = b/√12. Compare λ to 12 for short vs slender classification per IS 456.”
H. PYQ Linkage Note
| Topic | Exam appearance | Pattern |
|---|---|---|
| IS 875 part ID | Frequent MCQ | Match load type to Part 1–5 |
| Point load vs UDL | NAT / MCQ | PL/4 vs wL²/8 confusion |
| Wind roof suction | MCQ / MSQ | Slope threshold 30° |
| Slenderness λ | NAT | Le/r with effective length factors |
| Infill vs load-bearing | MSQ trap | Frame infill not in gravity path |
I. Mini-Check — Lesson 8.1
Q. Beam Bending Moment
A simply supported beam of span 8 m carries a UDL of 15 kN/m (total, unfactored). Applying load factor 1.5, the factored maximum bending moment in kN·m is ____.
Answer: wu = 1.5 × 15 = 22.5 kN/m; Mmax = 22.5 × 8² / 8 = 22.5 × 8 = 180 kN·m
Q. Column Slenderness Ratio
A square RC column (250 mm × 250 mm) has an effective length of 3.5 m. The slenderness ratio λ is ____.
Answer:
r = b/√12 = 250/3.464 = 72.2 mm
λ = Le/r = 3500/72.2 = 48.5
Classification: Slender (λ > 12)
Q. Load Types
Which of the following are classified as dynamic loads? Select all that apply.
(A) Dead load from RCC slab
(B) Seismic inertial force
(C) Wind load as per IS 875 Part 3 (when flutter governs)
(D) Imposed load from office occupants
(E) Impact load from elevator machinery
(F) Snow load on a roof in Shimla
Correct: B, C, E
– A = static (permanent). D = quasi-static live load. F = static snow load.
– B = seismic is inherently dynamic (treated as equivalent static for design).
– C = flutter is a dynamic self-excited aerodynamic phenomenon (not the same as static wind pressure).
– E = impact is a dynamic amplification of live load.
Q. IS 875 Part Identification
The design wind pressure on a building facade is governed by:
(A) IS 875 Part 1
(B) IS 875 Part 2
(C) IS 875 Part 3
(D) IS 1893:2016
Answer: (C) IS 875 Part 3
Part 1 = unit weights (dead load). Part 2 = imposed loads. IS 1893 = seismic. Wind loads, including windward pressure, leeward suction, roof suction coefficients, and design wind speed maps, are all in IS 875 Part 3 (2015 edition).
MCQ — Load Combination
For a residential ground-floor beam where wind and seismic are negligible, the governing limit-state combination per IS 456 is:
(A) 1.2 DL + 1.2 LL + 1.2 WL
(B) 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL
(C) 0.9 DL + 1.5 EL
(D) 1.5 DL + 1.5 EL
Answer: (B). Standard gravity design uses 1.5 DL + 1.5 LL. Wind and seismic combinations apply only when those loads govern the member.